Peri-Operative Outcomes Associated With the Placement of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Patients With Sarcoidosis: A Nationwide Database Analysis.

Rationale Sarcoidosis with cardiac involvement can be associated with serious life-threatening arrhythmias and an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) have been used for primary and secondary prevention of sudden death in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Post-ICD placement complications have been shown to be higher in patients with CS. However, data comparing postoperative ICD complications among sarcoidosis patients with the general population is limited. Here, we evaluated the association of postoperative complications with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in sarcoidosis.  Methods Using the NIS database, we identified cases of adults aged ≥ 18 years undergoing surgical placement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators between 2010 and 2019. Using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, we identified patients with sarcoidosis. In all statistical analyses, we applied weights provided by HCUP to produce results representative of national estimates. We compared categorical and continuous covariates in the baseline characteristics using the chi-square test and analysis of variance, respectively. We employed multivariable logistic and linear regression to compare binomial and continuous outcomes to assess differences in mortality rates. Results We analyzed 114073 patients during the study period. Of these, 1012 (0.9%) had sarcoidosis and were found to be significantly younger and female compared to patients without sarcoidosis (56.4 ±11.5 years vs. 65.6 ± 13.9 years, p <0.001) and (39.4% vs. 28.3%, p<0.001) respectively. Further, patients with sarcoidosis were more likely to be African American (45% vs. 16.3%), have private insurance (45.4% vs. 23.8%), and less likely to have Medicare (34.9% vs. 60.9%). Overall, post-ICD placement complications such as lead complications (4.2% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.03), post-procedure hemorrhage (4.1% vs. 5.5%, p=0.048), and requirement for transfusion (2.3% vs. 4.4%) were less likely in patients with sarcoidosis. Regarding post-ICD placement inpatient mortality, sarcoidosis was not associated with any difference (OR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.18-2.88 p=0.634). Conclusions Placement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with sarcoidosis is a safe procedure and is associated with significantly lower rates of lead complications, post-procedure hemorrhage, and requirement for transfusion. This is of great importance as it is known that patients with underlying sarcoidosis are predisposed to developing more cardiac complications.

Association between prediabetes and breast cancer: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer accounts for up to 30% of cancer cases in women in the US. Diabetes mellitus has been recognized as a risk factor for breast cancer. Some studies have suggested that prediabetes may also be associated with breast cancer whereas other studies have shown no or an inverse association; thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the risk of breast cancer in prediabetes. METHODS: We searched PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Scopus to identify studies that reported breast cancer risks in patients having prediabetes compared to normoglycemic patients. Binary random-effects model was used to calculate a pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. I2 statistics were used to assess heterogeneity. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis and subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: We analyzed 7 studies with 24,586 prediabetic and 224,314 normoglycemic individuals (783 and 5739 breast cancer cases, respectively). Unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for breast cancer was 1.45 (95% CI = 1.14, 1.83); adjusted OR was 1.19 (95% CI = 1.07, 1.34) in prediabetes. Subgroup analysis revealed a higher breast cancer risk in individuals aged less than 60 years (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.39, 2.49) than in those aged 60 years or more (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.97, 1.18). Subgroup analysis by median follow-up length indicated a higher risk of breast cancer for follow-ups of less than or equal to 2 years (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.85, 2.95) than in those of over 10 years (OR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.99, 1.23) and 6 to 10 years (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.88, 1.21). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, individuals with prediabetes have higher risk of developing breast cancer than those with normoglycemia, especially younger prediabetes patients. These individuals may benefit from early identification, monitoring, and interventions to reverse prediabetes.

Does Statin Use in Frail Patients Provide Survival Benefits? Insights From a Meta-Analysis.

Frailty is a complex syndrome that increases with age and predisposes older adults to adverse outcomes, including mortality. Statins are proven to lower the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but there is limited data on their survival benefit in frail older people. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether statins can lower mortality in frail persons. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS was conducted until September 2022 to identify studies reporting mortality outcomes with statin therapy in adults aged 75 with a validated frailty assessment. The pooled odds ratio for all-cause mortality was calculated using a random effects model. Leave-one-out method was used for sensitivity analysis. Of 5 studies (2013-2022) included (Total = 14,324, 3 prospective and 2 retrospectives, Males: 49%, Mean follow-up duration: 4.7 years), 41.6% (5971/14,324) were frail. 52.7% of patients were on a moderate-dose/no-statin, while 47.2% took a high-dose statin. Nonstatin users were older (83.35 vs 81.5) than users. Frail patients often had diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, a history of Stroke/MI, and dementia. High-dose atorvastatin was the most used statin. Pooled analysis revealed that statins lower all-cause mortality in elderly adults, however, the association was not significant (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.38-1.18; P = 0.17). The meta-analysis demonstrated that using statins to reduce mortality in frail patients does not appear justifiable. Further prospective studies are needed to guide statin use among frail older adults for survival benefits.

The impact of COVID-19 on mortality, length of stay, and cost of care among patients with gastrointestinal malignancies: A propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) pandemic have had a lasting impact on the care of cancer patients. The impact on patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies remains incompletely understood. We aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on mortality, length of stay (LOS), and cost of care among patients with GI malignancies, and identify differences in outcomes based on primary tumor site. METHODS: We analyzed discharge encounters collected from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between March 2020 and December 2020 using propensity score matching (PSM) and COVID-19 as the treatment effect. RESULTS: Of the 87,684 patient discharges with GI malignancies, 1892 were positive for COVID-19 (C+) and eligible for matching in the PSM model. Following PSM analysis, C+ with GI tumors demonstrated increased incidence of mortality compared to their COVID-19-negative (C-) counterparts (21.3% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.001). C+ patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) had significantly higher mortality compared to those who were C- (40% vs. 24%; p = 0.035). In addition, C+ patients with GI tumors had a longer mean LOS (9.4 days vs. 6.9 days; p < 0.001) and increased cost of care ($26,048.29 vs. $21,625.2; p = 0.001) compared to C- patients. C+ patients also had higher odds of mortality secondary to myocardial infarction relative to C- patients (OR = 3.54, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: C+ patients with GI tumors face approximately double the odds of mortality, increased LOS, and increased cost of care compared to their C- counterparts. Outcome disparities were most pronounced among patients with CRC.

Seasonal variation in in-hospital outcomes of Takotsubo-syndrome-related admissions: A National Inpatient Analysis, 2019.

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is a transitory stress-related cardiomyopathy characterized by acute but reversible left ventricular failure. The disease most commonly affects postmenopausal women following a traumatic experience, often presenting as an acute myocardial infarction (MI), and its prevalence is increasing globally. Cardiovascular events such as Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and stroke have well-defined seasonal variations and are most common in the winter [[8], [9], [10]]. However, there is insufficient data on the impact of such climatic variations on the etiopathogenesis and outcomes of TTS-related hospitalization in the United States.